Wyoming has a history with lotteries and it hasn’t been all that good. According
to wyomingtalesandtrails.com, Wyoming’s current lottery wasn’t the first. James Monroe Pattee’s 1875 "Wyoming
Lottery" was, they say, fraudulent. “There were many 50-cent winners, but
little else.”
Wyoming’s current lottery isn’t fraudulent. Neither is it all it was cracked
up to be. Wyoming was gambling when it created the lottery. Some might
argue that we lost.
Something’s wrong. It has been nearly three years since the
legislature approved the lottery. The bill passed the State House by a single
vote. Apprehensions haven’t lessened as the news about the lottery seems to be
mostly disappointing.
Some legislators who were reluctant to agree with the scheme
were persuaded the lottery would benefit their communities. Their constituents
were promised proceeds from lottery ticket purchases would funnel millions to
cities, towns, and schools. That’s not happening. Now lottery officials claim
to be on the verge of distributing a piddling $200,000 later this year.
The lottery would have been defeated if legislators had
known that nearly three years after start up, cities, towns, and schools could
share a whopping 200,000-dollar jackpot. This is no laughing matter as the
state is starring down a huge budget deficit that will deprive the cities,
towns, and schools with badly needed funding.
But while the lottery has been unable to keep its promise to
fund these programs, millions of lottery dollars have flowed into salaries,
overhead, marketing contracts, and lawyers.
Worse, the so-called “quasi-government” entity the legislature
created to run the show puts itself above accountability. The Corporation
refuses to be transparent, setting policies as though it was a private
enterprise entity that can hold proprietary secrets.
One sage said the lottery is a tax, albeit levied only on
people who are poor in math. Maybe it’s not a tax in the strictest terms but
every dollar comes from the public. Voters and their representatives were a bit
timid about the lottery in the first place. One might think the officials who
administer it would consider those opinions and bend over backwards to make
sure everything they did was open to public scrutiny.
Now we learn that the Commission has taken out loans or
lines of credit but it is none of our business how much and under what terms. The lottery board has a “public
information policy” that keeps loan activity secret. They forgot they are playing
with the house’s money and the public is the house.
To top it off, while there’s no money to share with cities,
towns, and schools, there is plenty enough to hire high-priced lawyers to bring
a lawsuit against Ed Atchison, a citizen who dared to question them.
When opponents raised concerns about gambling addiction, $200,000
of unclaimed prize money was earmarked to design gambling addiction programs at
the Department of Health. Obviously, the legislature expected the Commission to
take this issue seriously. In Atchison’s opinion, they didn’t. He made an issue
of their decisions.
When one corporate officer complained about Mr. Atchison to the
Wyoming Department of Health, she was told, “It's a balance between letting
individuals voice their concerns, provide feedback, etc. while not letting
personal agendas interfere with the larger picture.”
That, not a lawsuit, is the response of a public servant who respects
the role of advocates in our system. I won’t offer opinions on the legitimacy
of the lawsuit. The Court will decide those issues. But a lawsuit seems a heavy-handed
alternative to dealing with criticism. What’s more, it’s an odd use of Lottery
Commission resources when they haven’t yet been able to distribute a dime to
cities, towns, and schools.
Given the Commission’s ill-considered obsession with secrecy and
its failure to produce the promised revenue, it’s time for the legislature to
reconsider the lottery or, in the very least, to seriously question the manner
in which it is being managed.
As Kenny Rogers said, “You gotta know when to hold ‘em. You
gotta know when to fold ‘em.”
No comments:
Post a Comment