The Cheyenne Regional Medical Center board of trustees voted
to deny services to those who can’t afford full co-pays or deposits before
receiving medical care. Shame on them.
CRMC trustee Marion Schultz voted against the policy. She
doesn’t want people to think the hospital thinks more about money than people.
It’s hard to avoid that conclusion as the hospital impedes traffic on Warren, building
a huge new, costly edifice but cannot afford to provide adequate medical care
to the uninsured or underinsured.
There is shame to go around. Most falls on the governor and
the leadership of the Wyoming legislature. The politicians forced CRMC’s hand
when they decided they’d rather be anti-Obamacare than pro-people. They refused
an opportunity to expand Medicaid coverage to the uninsured, rejecting the
entreaty of Wyoming hospitals that are losing more than 200 million dollars a
year in uncompensated care.
The expansion of Medicaid coverage would have largely
eliminated this shortfall and the federal government would have borne nearly
all of the cost. Instead the uninsured will bear the cost. Medicaid would have
saved not only that 200 million but ten-of-millions more in state general funds
now spent on a hodge-podge collection of programs designed to help the uninsured.
But “the-governor-of-some-of-the-people” decided tea party
myths about Obamacare were more worthy than healthcare for thousands impacted
by his decision and the subsequent decision of the CRMC trustees.
The trustees took the responsibility off the governor and
put it on the uninsured, voting to deny care to people who need care but cannot
pay co-pays in full. Trustee chairman Joe Evans’ warned this fee is a barrier
for people seeking care when needed. Still the majority voted to demand $180
from a new uninsured patient before allowing the first visit. That’s about
three-quarters of a week’s pay for a low-income worker who is already in the
red paying rent, transportation, utilities, and groceries. Those fees are
unaffordable and will significantly increase the numbers of people in our
community who will be unable to afford care.
Neither the governor, nor the legislature, nor CRMC are
meeting their responsibilities. In the beginning CRMC should have done much
more than it did to make their case to the legislature. There was a hesitancy
to offend legislators on an issue of such political volatility. And now people
who need care pay the price.
This decision has an adverse affect on public health. The
uninsured and underinsured already experience significantly poorer health than
those with insurance. The uninsured have much less access to care than those
who are insured, and now that access is being further constricted in Laramie
County.
People without health insurance have little
preventive care. As a result, with cancer for example, studies confirm the
obvious. Uninsured individuals are
(1) less likely to receive cancer screening, (2) more likely to be diagnosed at
an advanced disease stage and (3) less likely to survive than privately insured
individuals.
The
National Health Interview Survey showed that 54% of uninsured people between 18
to 64 years of age had no usual source of healthcare compared to just 10% of
privately insured. The uninsured get sicker and die earlier than those with
insurance.
Not having health
insurance leads to additional costs. Without access to routine and preventive checkups,
uninsured individuals develop serious health problems that are more expensive to
treat without early detection. A lack of access to affordable medication also leads to serious health problems in the
future that adequate insurance could have prevented.
Those
statistics make the governor’s decision not to expand Medicaid and CRMC’s
decision to deny care all the more unjust. In the end both CRMC and the state
will spend much more money on much sicker people.
That’s
not a surprise to CRMC. It’s always easier to focus on low-income families
rather than speaking the truth to the governor about how his indecisiveness and
the legislature’s callousness caused this.
CRMC and
its trustees should be advocates for, not impediments to, those who need
medical services.
No comments:
Post a Comment