Governor Ed Herschler used a darkly humorous anecdote to
call attention to political hypocrisy. His was the story of the young man who
murdered both parents and then begged the court for mercy on the grounds that
he was a lonely orphan.
That story came to mind when Lummis’ self-serving,
taxpayer funded website reported, “Lummis Votes to Fund Troops, Prevent Government Shutdown.” Are you as
incredulous as me? Some of her GOP colleagues called her Tea Party
strategy of shutting down the government “lunacy.” Being a lunatic is one thing. Being dishonest
is another.
Lummis was one of 70 House zealots demanding the Speaker of
the House blackmail President Obama with the threat to close down the
government unless Obamacare was repealed, defunded or delayed. She and her Tea
Party allies got what they wanted. You’d think they’d take credit, or at least
accept responsibility.
But no. Her constituent letter, answering those who are
angry, predictably blames Harry Reid and President Obama. “We are at this juncture,” says
Lummis, “because President Barack Obama and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid
have refused to agree to fundamental fairness in the implementation of
Obamacare.”
That’s
blatantly dishonest. The “fundamental fairness” of the law was settled when Congress
passed the law, the Supreme Court found it Constitutional, and the American
people soundly reelected Barack Obama at the end of a campaign where her party
made repeal of the law the theme of their campaign to defeat him.
Lummis’
distortion attempts to convey the idea that she is Diogenes, looking for an
honest debate when what she actually wants is to repeal the law and deny
millions of Americans affordable health insurance and consumer protections.
She
blames “the Administration,” saying Obama “has closed off national parks and
other federal lands to visitors, furloughed employees, and curtailed numerous
other federal activities and programs on which people and businesses in Wyoming
rely.” Please.
It’s
an insult to our intelligence when she proffers a strategy she knows will
result in a government shutdown and then raises the “orphan’s” defense. She’d
like us to believe she was shocked when her vote to shutdown the government
actually shutdown the government.
As
one of her Republican colleagues, Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA) said, she and others
who insisted on this strategy are not really conservatives. They are nothing
more than obstructionists who are more interested in proving their talking
points than they are in governing. That’s why three-quarters of all voters and
a majority of Republicans blame them for this fiasco. It’s understandable that
Lummis is blaming others for the unfortunate success of her scheme.
Her
letter then shifts to the debt limit. “Republicans in the House are choosing
not to hand over the already maxed out federal credit card yet again without
some semblance of accountability on the part of the President and
Democrat-controlled Senate,” Lummis mythologizes.
House
Republicans ran up this deficit. They approved every penny. Then they threatened
not to pay the bills under a schizo-scheme to repeal Obamacare. Lummis voted
for a government default knowing the result would be disastrous and not caring.
Hurricane Sandy cost taxpayers 50 million dollars. Hurricane Tea Party cost us
24 billion. And she calls herself a “fiscal conservative”?
Lummis
doesn’t tell the truth. The “orphan” in Herschler’s story knew the truth would
get him a guilty verdict. Lummis realizes that the truth just doesn’t sound
right. But she knows her constituents. If the orphan had blamed Obama, a
Wyoming jury might well have voted to acquit.
Truth-telling
wouldn’t threaten her politically. That alone should offer an opportunity to be
honest about her role in this disaster. But, no.
Before Lummis was Barbara Cubin, a
Republican who served five terms despite one of the worst attendance records in
congressional history. During her last term, she had the worst attendance
record in the House. Of the four worst voting records Cubin was number one. The
other three died in office.
We
didn’t know how good we had it back then.
I got Lummis's letter, but I couldn't bear to read it, knowing how filled with lies it would be (given all the other letters I've received from her). Thank you for doing that work for me and writing such a fitting response. I just found your blog, so I'll take a look at your other posts. Thank you.
ReplyDelete