Jesus said,
“Judge not lest you be judged.” Pope Francis asked, “Who am I to judge?”
By
reconnecting the church to Jesus’ words, this Pope has moved his church
inexorably toward justice for gays and lesbians. Francis stressed homosexuals
should be treated with dignity (unlike the treatment they endure from the pen
of some WTE letter writers) and not marginalized.
“If someone
is gay,” said the Vicar of Christ, “and he searches for the Lord and has good
will, who am I to judge?”
Peter’s
denied knowing Jesus three times. Jesus
forgave him but asked Peter three times, “Simon son of John, do you love
me?” Assured Peter loves him, Jesus entrusted Peter with the care of his flock.
Thus Peter is considered the first Pope.
Gays
and lesbians wish they had only needed to ask three times whether the church loves
them. After decades in which the church has shamefully rejected homosexuals,
opposed efforts to protect their rights to be an integral part of society, and
marginalized them, at long last Christ’s representative on earth has made it
clear to the flock. "The Gospel is for
everyone, not just for some," Francis said.
The
Pope’s words must have shocked the Catholic hierarchy. In 2005, during the
reign of the resigned Pope Benedict XVI, the Vatican issued directives barring from the priesthood men
"who are actively homosexual, have deep-seated homosexual tendencies, or
support the so-called 'gay culture."
While the Pope said he wouldn’t judge gay priests, he did judge
those in the Vatican whom he said “lobby” for gay rights. Hopefully he’ll be equally
critical of the lobbying in which the Church engages to deny gays and lesbians
basic civil rights.
While the Catholic Church has not yet made a complete 180-degree
turn, the weight of the Pope’s promise to neither judge nor marginalize
homosexuals is earthshaking. Pope
Francis’ words are a departure from earlier Vatican directives and even a
departure from his own earlier thinking. When the Argentine government
legalized gay marriage, then Bishop Bergoglio was
opposed, calling it "a destructive attack on God's plan."
It would be a mistake to think that the Catholic Church will
immediately support marriage equality. Yet, if the Pope were serious when he
says homosexuals should not be marginalized, it would seem that at the very
least the church should support legislation protecting gays and lesbians from
job related discrimination.
Today most states, including Wyoming, allow sexual-orientation-based
discrimination. Good workers can be fired, denied a promotion, and be otherwise
marginalized simply for being who God made them to be. Earlier this year the
Wyoming legislature endorsed this form of discrimination when it defeated
legislation which would have protected LGBT workers from discrimination.
Pope
Francis’ words are at odds with the position taken last month by the US
Conference of Catholic Bishops. In a letter setting forth their reasons to
oppose the Employment
Non-Discrimination Act, the Bishops said that
while they’re against “unjust discrimination” against people with “a homosexual
inclination” they believed that protecting them from job-based discrimination
was tantamount to protecting sexual conduct
outside of marriage.
Of course, the bill doesn’t
do that. It simply provides protections to homosexual and transgender workers similar
to protections afforded to other minority groups under the Civil Rights and Americans
with Disabilities Acts.
In
Wyoming, the Bishop withdrew his church from the Wyoming Association of
Churches this year complaining about positions taken by the Association in the
legislature. WAC lobbied against the lottery, for prohibiting sex-trafficking,
for Medicaid expansion and for a tax increase on cigarettes. But what most
likely got the Bishop’s ire was WAC’s work to end employment related
discrimination against homosexuals.
In
large organizations it takes time for decisions made at the top to reach the
bottom. Catholic or not, Christian or not, like it or not…what the Pope says
matters. While, for now, the Bishops continue to judge homosexuals, the Pope
and Jesus are, alas, of one accord. What is it about “judge not” that’s so hard
to understand?
No comments:
Post a Comment