When Stalin’s collectivization caused mass starvation in
Ukraine, he used Orwellian explanations, putting blame on victims. Starving
peasants, Stalin said, were a part of the anti-communist conspiracy.
Before becoming disillusioned with Communism, Hungarian
journalist Arthur Koestler saw Communism as an alternative to capitalism. As
the corpses of Russian peasants accumulated, Koestler defended Stalin. He said
they were starving themselves, he said, because they were “enemies of the state
who preferred begging to work.”
That sounds like what we hear today about people needing
help. The denigration of the poor is rather untoward in a country many also
believe to be a nation built on Judeo-Christian values.
Communism wasn’t an alternative to capitalism. But
capitalism without a conscience poses its own problems. The US has always
struggled to make certain our economic system doesn’t lose its conscience.
That’s why safety-net programs were created. The most
effective is food stamps. The program started during the Depression as a way of
feeding hungry Americans while selling surplus crops and propping up
agriculture. It continues to serve those purposes admirably.
During Lent my wife and I are trying to live on a food stamp
budget. After recent congressional cuts, that’s $11 per day for the two of us
or about a buck 83 apiece for each meal.
We decided to do that for two reasons. One, we wanted to
experience what it’s like for those whose life circumstances dictate they feed
their family with food stamps. Second, our church started the “Lenten Fund,” a
way for people to donate savings from whatever they may sacrifice during Lent.
The fund will be used to help families in need.
We’ve blogged about the experience and chronicled some of it
on Facebook. The feedback has been striking. Much of it comes from people
who’ve actually been there and done that for real. They tell stories of times
in their lives when food stamps were a necessity. For many it’s what enabled
them to feed their children during tough times.
Equally striking are comments like this one, “At least
people on food stamps get free food. I have to work for mine.” The sentiment
comes in different forms but mostly reflects the anti-poor bias mythology
surrounding the program. Comments often allude to Fox News stories singling out
the most egregious uses of food stamps. The one gaining the most currency today
is the Seattle surfer who proudly told Fox how he uses the stamps to buy
lobster.
Critics turn anecdotes into data because the data proves
them wrong.
In a recent program Jon Stewart hit the nail on the head. “Just because six
different Fox News shows trotted out the same ‘food stamp abuse bigfoot’
doesn't mean one lobster-eating surfer represents millions of Americans on food
assistance.”
Many
hold tightly to stereotypes badly in need of updating. Psychologists call it
confirmation bias. People tend to filter out facts inconsistent with their
prejudices. False stereotypes persist because they confirm our biases.
With
the Internet, accurate information is as easy to obtain as untruths. The facts
are that 83% of all food stamp benefits go to households with young children or
the elderly or disabled. The program imposes work requirements for able-bodied
recipients. Many of those receiving assistance are working but at jobs paying
so little they still qualify. The average food stamp household has a gross monthly income of
$744.
Those
who criticize food stamp recipients would do better to turn their unhappiness
on politicians who refuse to raise the minimum wage. That would be the most
effective means of reducing safety-net costs.
The
times call for some empathy among citizens. At some time in our lives, most
Americans will need public assistance. Jaron Lanier’s new book “Who Owns the
Future” predicts “hyper-unemployment” when computer software replaces drivers
of cars and trucks, when machines rather than humans mine coal, and robots
provide nursing care.
If
Lanier is correct, many of those now harboring resentments about helping others
will find themselves in the food stamp line.
Empathy is lacking in a heartless society, grab and go !
ReplyDeleteI adamantly agree. I got folks in Texas who are anti-poor. It's a shame because I know they weren't raised that way. Brain-washed or damaged goods, I don't know which. It's gotten to the point where we can't even speak anymore without one of them dragging politics into the conversation. I'm losing my family through the politics of division.
ReplyDelete