Name the last Wyoming
governor elected by Democrats. Dave Freudenthal? Nope. It was Republican Matt
Mead. Hundreds, some say thousands of progressives, many of them Democrats who switched
parties in the primary, gave Mead the nomination assuring him the governorship.
He won by 703 votes, a fraction of the Democratic crossovers.
Mead wasn’t elected by Tea Partiers or
other conservatives, but by Wyoming progressives. Most Republicans wanted
someone else. Like the Democratic-switchovers, they thought Mead was a
moderate. As governor he’s worked hard to prove both wrong. Once elected, he
calculated his political future is best secured by appealing to those who
didn’t trust him in the beginning.
When
the Supreme Court ruled Obamacare constitutional, it regrettably created one
last playground for playing the politics of Obamacare with the lives of people who
have no health insurance, limited access to healthcare and even less access to decision
makers.
Mead insists the decision on whether to
expand Medicaid shouldn’t be political. Yet there’s no other, genuine explanation
for his decision to kick the can upstairs to legislators who have already
demonstrated a penchant for playing politics with the issue. To be fair, let’s take
his claim not to be playing politics at face value. Here, Mr. Mead, are the
facts
Meet the uninsured who
could be covered under Medicaid expansion. “I am one of the 30K,” one emailed. “I
am the director of a non-profit agency that creates hope, saves lives and
builds Wyoming communities. Most non-profits cannot afford health care for
their employees, but we do the work because we believe that making a difference
is more important.”
One-fourth of all veterans
of Iraq and Afghanistan don’t have health insurance (WTE November 20, 2012). Governor
Mead talks loftily at Veteran’s Day ceremonies about their service but is quite
willing to allow the legislature to leave them behind and uninsured.
Most of the remaining are among
the working poor, working hard at multiple jobs earning so little they cannot
afford health insurance or healthcare. Many work in the food service and
construction industries, home healthcare and childcare, each critical to
Wyoming’s economy.
The federal government covers 100% of the costs for newly
eligible citizens in the first three years, gradually dropping to 90% after 10
years. Mead’s response, “What if they don’t?” Notice that although his budget
recommends accepting tens of millions of federal dollars for other programs, he
doesn’t ask the “what if” question about any other dollar coming from
Washington on which Wyoming routinely relies for everything from roads to
education and a myriad of other healthcare programs.
The
governor has long claimed expanding Medicaid will cost a great deal of money. He
knows better but only yesterday did his administration announce that Medicaid
expansion is “a better budgetary choice for the State General Fund. Pursuant to
the Department of Health’s analysis, expanding Medicaid to cover optional
expansion adults would result in a net savings to the General Fund of $47.4
million from FY 2014-2020."
How is
that? Wyoming spends millions funding health programs serving the uninsured, from
substance abuse treatment to prescription drugs. Today hospitals write off or
shift costs of uninsured patients who can’t pay their bills. That could end. Nearly
all of those dollars could be saved if Medicaid is expanded.
The infusion
of federal dollars resulting from expansion would be an economic opportunity,
increasing revenue to Wyoming providers, hospitals, clinics, nursing homes and
pharmacies while offering good
jobs to Wyoming people. The Department
of Workforce Services projects 10,000 new jobs in the healthcare sector over
the next 10 years.
Earlier in the
week the Governor visited with a crowd at a Circles meeting. Many were low
income, hard working folks. He graciously stopped to talk to each family though
I know he was behind schedule. I’ve been told he and his wife quietly, with no
fanfare, serve meals at COMEA, the homeless shelter. Governor…these are some of
the 30,000 people who depend on your decision. You have their lives and
healthcare in your hands. The facts are not
standing in your way.
So true. Unfortunately, a newly elected legislator from Cheyenne (quoted in a related news story in the WTE today) is relying on a flimsy protest about the inability of the federal government to follow through. Alas. We need real statesmen in the Legislature who are serious about serving the people in Wyoming.
ReplyDeleteMaybe the legislature should remove all federal dollars from the state budget since the feds are apparently so unreliable
ReplyDelete