Last month my wife and I saw the Broadway production of
Arthur Miller’s play “Death of a Salesman,” a rude reminder of what awaits
those who are driven by delusion. I received another such reminder upon
returning from New York and finding an email from an old friend.
Her child was diagnosed with an especially virulent disease.
The prognosis is troubling. Our relationship
is close. I know she felt odd asking me for spiritual advice. But she wanted to
know. Does God test us? If so, why? How do we know whether we pass the test?
Why do we pray?
A professor at the seminary I attended warned, “Be careful
of what you tell people. Some of them might just believe you!” My friend, like
most of us, has been told over our lifetime that God does test us, gives us burdens
God knows we can bear. Is that true? She wanted to know as she watches her
daughter struggle. Is this a time for
guessing?
Starting with the question about whether God even exists, we
are all guessing. We point to the creation as evidence of the Creator. That’s
what lawyers call circumstantial evidence. It’s true, you can win a case with
circumstantial evidence but you are still asking the jury to make its best guess.
Circumstantial
evidence differs from “direct” evidence. It creates an inference from which a fact
may be deduced. Circumstantial evidence isn’t first-hand eyewitness accounts.
It consists of things like fingerprints at the crime scene, or the presence of
the accused in the vicinity.
Direct
evidence, such as eyewitness testimony, is generally considered more powerful,
but successful lawyers often rely on circumstantial evidence. When
circumstantial evidence is cumulative, the weakness of such evidence is
strengthened.
It’s persuasive to suggest the beauty of the mountains, the
sky, lakes, and oceans demonstrate the existence of God. There’s no reasonable
doubt when you consider the complexities of our DNA, genetics and anatomy. Just
look at the chemical and organic properties of life and the way in which it has
all evolved over millions of years. It’s easy to see the hand of God in all of
that. Easy, but still circumstantial.
Circumstantial evidence leaves the jury wondering. Yeah,
they are persuaded but they wish they had some direct evidence. They’re asked
to make life and death decisions. Didn’t anyone actually see something,
someone, hear a voice?
Is there an eyewitness to the existence of God? No. There
are reports in the Bible of those who have seen God. Moses, Abraham, the
prophets. Those reports don’t differ much from compelling claims of those who
saw Babe the Ox and Paul Bunyan. Someone saw George Washington toss a silver
dollar across the Potomac; another saw Abe Lincoln study by candlelight. Those
stories gave us a reason to be patriotic Americans. The Bible stories give us reasons
to be faithful. But all they give us is circumstantial reasons.
When someone about whom you care is suffering and asks for
the evidence, can you simply guess? As a pastor, I find the answer in
proclaiming the mystery of God. If God wanted the answers to be so easy they’d
grace a bumper sticker, God could have created that world. God chose to create
a world infinitely more complex, one filled with ambiguities rather than
answers.
So I offer prayers to God for her and her daughter and the
rest of us, trusting that the God I trust, the God of grace and love will be
there for all of us in God’s own mysterious ways.
Roger; great response and well thought. I was confronted with the same issue years ago with a couple whose baby died just before delivery. I discovered that most people in trauma aren't listening yet, they are all feelings and your professor hit it on the head. I have told some that life happens and yes it happens contrary to our own best wishes and the best one can hope for is the love and care of those they surround themselves with.
ReplyDeletethanks.....Pastor Jon