Who’d have thought it? It turns out that one of the main
reasons the feds can’t balance its budget is that many of the states are
hypocritical beggars and that the biggest beggars of all are the
Republican-controlled states.
Wyoming politicians get elected by whining about the perceived
slights, wrongs, and atrocities committed by Washington. They complain about the
federal debt and make unsupported assertions about “waste and fraud.” The
Governor of this cash-strapped state always finds enough money to pay
high-priced lawyers to pursue lawsuits against Uncle Sam over everything from
wolves to Obamacare to transgender bathrooms.
Let’s face it. No state complains more about the “feds” than
Wyoming and few states take more federal money than Wyoming. Only a dozen take
more, but 37 states take far less. St. Jerome said it best in his 5th century Letter
to the Ephesians, “Noli equi dentes inspicere donate,” meaning never inspect
the teeth of a gift horse. It’s impolite. Wyoming politicians don’t just
inspect the gift-horse’s teeth, they pull them before constituents can see how
broken down are their decayed arguments about balanced budgets.
Take Sen. Ogden Driskill, R-Devils Tower. He thinks controlling the federal debt through the
states-led balanced budget amendment to the U.S. Constitution “is probably the
most important issue that is going to face our state and the nation.”
Then with a whip in one hand and an outstretched palm of the
other, Wyoming leads that gift horse to the federal trough. Wyoming lawmakers
failed to diversify the state’s economy through yet another boom. All the
while, they created a tax structure designed to serve the interests of the
mineral industry, guaranteeing that when the inevitable bust came, our state
would need even more federal welfare.
Most Wyoming
legislators have never voted to turn away federal dollars. Oh, there’s the
exception of those federal dollars that would provide healthcare for 18,000
low-income working people through Medicaid expansion. And there was that time
in 2011 when legislators said no to 38 million federal dollars for extended
unemployment benefits for the jobless. Legislators said those folks weren’t
looking hard enough for then non-existent jobs and that they should just start
a business.
Senator
Charlie Scott is another example. While calling Medicaid “a welfare program”
and leading the campaign to stop expansion he accepts thousands of federal
dollars in agricultural subsidies. There are many other legislators who happily
take federal agricultural subsidies and one, Sen. Eli Bebout (R-Fremont) who
makes millions from Abandoned Mine Land contracts, all tainted federal money.
These Wyoming
politicians nonetheless repeat this anti-Washington diatribe on an unbroken
loop with no sense of irony. Perhaps Congress could balance its budget if
states like Wyoming didn’t expect so much federal aid.
Then there’s this. The Tax Foundation has identified a
partisan tint to the hypocrisy. “There is a very strong correlation,” the Foundation discovered,
“between a state voting for Republicans and receiving more in federal spending
than its residents pay to the federal government in taxes. In essence, those in
blue states are subsidizing those in red states.”
It’s
easy to be “fiscally conservative” knowing all that blue-state tax money flows
into the state coffers. Easy, but hypocritical.
Oh
yeah, the study also concluded that red states, those most critical of welfare
programs, use the most food stamps.
These
findings shed light on federal spending and the source of the national debt. Wyoming
politicians are addicted to federal money except when it provides health care
for poor and low-income working families. In that case alone they say they can’t
trust the feds to pay up.
Wyoming
trusts the feds to pay up in every other way. We rely on federal dollars to
balance the state’s budget. The bottom line is red state Wyoming is dependent
on the generosity of blue state taxpayers to do for us what our economy can’t
do for itself and what legislators can’t do without the hated feds, pay the
public’s bills.
A simple “thank you” would be in order.
No comments:
Post a Comment