After using a
series of metaphors to describe himself as “the bread of life,” a “door” or a
“gate,” and “the Good Shepherd,” Jesus, a devout Jew, said, "I am the way,
the truth, and the life; no one comes to the Father, but by me.”
“Is Jesus the
only way?” That’s this month’s question in a series of columns Rev. Bob Norris
and I are offering to explain differences between liberal and conservative
Christians.
A foundational
difference between most conservatives and most liberals is the role of Biblical
scholarship. Liberals value research that begins with the text and looks beyond
it into the history, linguistics, and culture of the people who wrote the Bible
and the language in which it was written.
Conservatives often
reject Biblical scholarship because it frequently challenges a strict
interpretation of scripture, the anchor of their beliefs. Liberals rejoice in
Biblical scholarship believing it’s the key to unlocking the meaning.
Trying to
understand scripture without looking beyond it is like trying to see a scenic
meadow through a wall instead of a window. Looking through that window has not always
been welcomed. Scholarship didn’t become a part of Bible studies until the mid
19th century. Before then archeology was designed only to back
strict interpretation of the Bible. After Darwin’s “The Origin of the Species,”
Biblical scholars were persecuted. Some lost their preaching or teaching jobs.
Others suffered church trials.
After World War
II Biblical scholarship was resuscitated. Seminaries chose sides. Some retained
fundamentalist teachings. Others were open to where science, anthropology, archeology,
linguistics, and other disciplines led.
The most
influential development was the Jesus Seminar, a group of 150 esteemed scholars
and laypersons. Having arrived at this work with years of study, the Jesus
Seminar spent additional years looking at the Gospels. They aimed to discern
when and where each was written, by whom and to what purpose, studying the
influences at work and the messages each word intended to convey.
A profound part of
this endeavor led scholars to distinguish “Jesus” from “Christ.” There’s a
discernible difference between what Jesus said before the crucifixion and the
words attributed to him afterward when he became “the Christ.”
The Jesus Seminar
produced what is called the Scholars’ Version of the Gospels. They color-coded
the words of Jesus. Words in red indicate that, in the opinion of the scholars,
these words are unequivocally the words of Jesus.
Words believed, “with
some reservation,” to be those of Jesus are printed in pink. Gray signifies
words that probably weren’t spoken by Jesus but are useful in determining who
Jesus was.
Black lettering means
the scholars concluded “Jesus did not say this; it represents the perspective
or content of a later or different tradition.”
The Jesus Seminar
published "I am the way, the truth, and the life; no one comes to the
Father, but by me” in black letters. Most scholars believe these words reflect
“early Christian circles.” During the early days of the church, Jesus followers
were separating theologically from the Jewish community of which many were a
part. The “I am” sayings are employed to explain why they chose to follow
Jesus.
Though the words
are attributed to the Jewish rabbi, conservative Christians argue, “I am the
way,” means Christianity is the gatekeeper to God. Liberal Christians reject
this exclusionary view. There is one God but there are many paths leading to
that God. Christianity is not the only way. Jesus’ way, however, is,
though it’s a way expressed as much in the Hebrew Bible, the Quran, Upanishads,
or Bhagavad Gita as in the Gospels.
For example, Matthew’s
Jesus speaks. “Do unto others what you want them to do to you.” The way of
Jesus is expressed similarly in Islam where Muhammad taught, “That which you
want for yourself, seek for mankind,” and among Hindus, “One should never do to
another which one regards as injurious to one’s self.”
In other words, you can follow the way of Jesus without
being a Christian.
Jesuit priest and scholar, Jacques Dupuis, in his book:" Toward a Christian Theology of Religious Pluralism," takes a "Trinitarian" approach to Jesus' "I am the way, the truth and the light. No one comes to the Father except through me."
ReplyDeleteHe postulates that Jesus, in Christian theology, is the Logos, the Second person of the triune God, who from eternity has brought to the Father (Creator) whomever the Logos has wished to bring. These include "other sheep" who are not of the Christian fold.
This is the "good news" that Christians should be proclaiming to the world.