Wyoming is at a historic crossroad. Yogi Berra said when you
come to a fork in the road, take it. But Robert Frost knew that when two roads
converge in a yellow wood, you cannot take them both. You have a choice between
the easy one and the one less taken.
Wyoming is there. Our long, easy reliance on fossil fuels is
coming to an end. Oil prices are hovering at a per-barrel price much less than
required to fund the state’s budget. Coal is fast becoming history. Like the
little Dutch boy with his finger in the leaking dyke, the state’s politicians
have “courageously” attempted to hold climate change reality at bay. But the leak was real and too large for their
thumbs.
Here we are. Two roads diverge in a yellow wood, and sorry
we cannot travel both, we stare down one as far as we can, hoping for an easy
stroll by the coming river of red ink.
As the reality of the international drop in the reliance on
fossil fuels crept upon us, Wyoming politicians avoided anything that resembled
vision. With thumbs in the dyke, they hoped against hope that a new technology
or fake scientists could save us from the wrath.
But the first episode of this reality show requires state
lawmakers to cut 200 million dollars from the state’s budget. Legislators can
take the easy road or the road they have far less traveled, the one that
requires vision.
Traveling the road less traveled means giving some thought
to where we want to be at the end of that road. We know the financial structure
the state uses to support it goals must change. The question is how will the
state change?
A state’s budget isn’t simply a collection of numbers. It’s
a reflection of the state’s vision for the future. Legislators must do more
than add and subtract. They must have an idea of what they are adding to and
subtracting from. Unfortunately, with all that fossil fuel money flowing, they
haven’t had to do that. Now they must.
Simply cutting budgets while parroting the threadbare mantra
“no new taxes” is easy. That requires little thought and no vision. However,
this year’s 200 million dollar cut is not the end but only the beginning of a
long, painful readjustment. If we attempt to stay on the easy road, we will one
day come to the end and find not only a stagnant economy but also a declining
population with little hope.
Instead of asking what budget can be cut and which programs
eliminated, our lawmakers might ask where are we going? What kind of a state do
we want? What is our vision for Wyoming?
My suggestion is that they put people and families first.
There is ample evidence from financial thinkers such as the Federal Reserve
Board that a commitment to early childhood education produces not only
healthier children and families but also a more vibrant economy. That would
give families and businesses a reason to come here and stay.
Legislators could make Wyoming a shining example of what
happens when a state commits itself to making higher education affordable for
everyone. Create quality jobs by focusing the budget on improving the state’s
infrastructure. Make the health of our citizens a priority with tobacco taxes
high enough to reduce smoking and use the revenue to pay the costs of early
childhood and higher education.
These are the times that will try voters’ souls. I’m not
confident the voters did a very good job in the last election of choosing
visionary rather than doctrinaire lawmakers. But they’ll get another chance
after the coming budget session. Regardless of whom they choose, Wyoming will
be at that place where two roads diverge.
I’d like to think the day will come when we shall be telling
this with a sigh. Two roads diverged in a wood, and we—we took the one less
traveled by. And that has made all the difference.
No comments:
Post a Comment