“What we got heah…is failyah to communicate.”
If you’re old enough to have seen Paul Newman play “Cool
Hand Luke,” you’ll remember. The captain of the Southern prison road crew said
this just before Luke was killed.
The hopes of nearly 18 thousand low-income, mostly working
Wyoming people were killed by the legislature last week, just as dead as Luke.
It wasn’t because of a failure to communicate.
It was a failure of honest leadership starting with Governor
Matt Mead. He’s so afraid of his own shadow he doesn’t emerge from his hole as
often as Punxsutawney
Phil. After this year’s defeat, Mead
emerged long enough to say, "We must recognize what health care means
to individuals and to our economy. While I respect different views, the fact is
today we are left with working poor without coverage.” He was right…finally.
This “leader” spent three years telling legislators Medicaid
expansion was a bad idea. He wrote the talking points Republican legislators used
to poison the well.
The blatant dishonesty reached peaks seldom realized in the legislature.
We’ve come to expect nothing less from Senator Charlie Scott. Scott has served
since Jimmy Carter was president. He’s made a career of harming low-income
workers. He successfully fought workplace safety and adequate wages. He
gerrymandered legislative districts to assure one-party control.
During the debate, Scott warned legislators not to trust the
feds. While depositing thousands of dollars from agricultural subsidies into
his own bank account, Scott said, "You know that because when you look at
their finances, they’re in bad trouble across the United States."
Sen. Leland Christensen said, “Wyoming needs to find its own way
to take care of the uninsured.” He said the Affordable Care Act is not the
answer. The disingenuousness of this proclamation is evidenced by the fact that
during the years-long debate on Obamacare and Medicaid expansion, neither
Christensen nor any of his colleagues have offered a single idea for doing so.
Not one.
Then there’s Sen. Larry Hicks who says, “The federal government has
crippling debt. This puts us one step closer to economic collapse.” Wyoming, the
argument goes, must help reduce the federal debt by refusing this program, but,
only this one.
This assertion flunks the “pants-on-fire” test. These same
legislators are willing to rely on the federal government to balance the state
budget. The state constitution requires they balance that budget. They can do
so only because nearly 20% of it comes from Washington.
They can’t balance the state’s budget without violating the
arguments they make against Medicaid expansion. Yet neither Hicks nor Scott nor
any of their anti-Medicaid colleagues have ever suggested Wyoming reject any of
that money. They reserve that specious argument for dollars that could
otherwise provide healthcare for low-income working people.
Then there’s Tony Ross. He was the only Laramie County state
senator voting against Medicaid. Ross’s argument? He didn’t really have one of
his own. He just mimicked Charlie Scott despite the fact that Medicaid experts
proved Charlie’s “facts” untrustworthy. Ross has the position and the
wherewithal to lead. But he decided to follow and to follow the wrong man.
When the legislature killed Medicaid expansion this
year, they did so knowing their votes will cost Wyoming taxpayers at least 100
million dollars each biennium. They knew their votes rejected tens of millions more
that could have been used to improve the state’s health infrastructure and
local economies while providing more than 800 new jobs. They knew some
hospitals in the state wouldn’t survive because of the financial hemorrhaging
caused by the cost of uncompensated care for the uninsured. They knew 18,000 people would be needlessly
left without health insurance meaning many will get far sicker than need be and
some will die prematurely.
They also knew the arguments they made against the
bill were entirely bogus.
Unlike Cool Hand Luke, Medicaid expansion wasn’t
killed because of any “failyah to communicate.” They knew the truth. The
bill died because of a willful “failyah of political honestly.”
I concur
ReplyDeleteEither blatant dishonesty, or willful ignorance. Take your pick. They have no shame.
ReplyDelete