Wednesday, September 12, 2018

Civility doesn't preclude harsh confrontation


Jesus said, “Either make the tree good, and its fruit good; or make the tree bad, and its fruit bad; for the tree is known by its fruit. You brood of vipers! How can you speak good things, when you are evil? For out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaks. The good person brings good things out of a good treasure, and the evil person brings evil things out of an evil treasure.

“I tell you, on the day of judgment you will have to give an account for every careless word you utter; for by your words you will be justified, and by your words you will be condemned.” (Matthew 12:33-37)
Today, calls for civility are ubiquitous. 

But, what does “civility” mean? Many look to Rodney King. “Can’t we all just get along?” President Trump defined “civility” in a self-serving manner when he said that when anti-racism protesters confronted neo-Nazis in Charlottesville that “there were good people on both sides.” With the exception of the neo-Nazis, few Americans agreed with him.

The Southern Poverty Law Center says ours is “a world in which white nationalist talking points circulate with shocking ease,” coming often from those in what were once believed to be seats of responsibility.
How are we to understand civility in the context of a dramatically heated national debate about issues as serious and nation-defining as racism? If you turn to the dictionary, you’d believe that civility is “formal politeness and courtesy in behavior and speech.”

Compare that to other examples, e.g. Meghan McCain’s poignant eulogy for her father and what Jesus said in the Gospels.

In the 12th chapter of Matthew, the first century version of a culture war is raging. The debate between Jesus and his adversaries produces harsh words on both sides of the immense divide. Whenever I hear a call for civility in these troubled times, I am reminded of the words of Jesus. “You brood of vipers,” he called his adversaries. In fairness, they had just called him “the ruler of the demons.”

So, Jesus was giving as good as he took. For Jesus, that was civility and if it’s good enough for him, it ought to be good enough for us. After all, he is talking about good trees and bad, good fruit and bad, evil people and evil treasure.

And then Jesus went on to say a few verses later that "on the day of judgment you will have to give an account for every careless word you utter; for by your words you will be justified, and by your words you will be condemned.”

There are, therefore, occasions when Jesus approves of challenging others with some pretty harsh language. “Careless words” include those words not spoken when they should have been spoken, words that are not appropriately certain and harsh when certain harshness is appropriate.

I am still reeling from watching Spike Lee’s movie “Black Klansmen.” It is stunning reminder that the demon racism has never died off and its practice is now politically correct. That demands Christians and people of other faiths denounce its practitioners with the sort of harsh, clear language that leaves no room for doubt.

Jesus does not expect us to employ silence or niceties and polite tripe when confronting racists, misogynists, those who weaponize the Bible, those who attack fellow believers who travel a different path to find God than do we, or those who separate children from their parents at the border. They are indeed a brood of vipers and Jesus teaches us we should call it what it is. 

We are the tree about which Jesus spoke. We are expected to produce the fruit of his teachings. How we respond determines whether the tree and its fruit will be good or bad. On the day of judgment, we will be called to account for “every careless word,” and among them will be words not spoken in timidity or fear or not strong enough to match the evils we are witnessing. 






Sunday, September 2, 2018

This morning's Sermon at Highlands


The lectionary asks us to preach from Mark’s Gospel this morning. 

It’s the 7th chapter and tells us of the day the religious rule makers were offended that Jesus’s disciple had not washed their hands before eating. Defiled hands, they called them.
Jesus suggested that maybe these critics honored God, not with their hearts but with their lips; that they had abandoned the commandments of God in favor of their tradition. Jesus told them, that in his view, they QUOTE have a fine way of rejecting the commandment of God in order to keep your tradition! 

If ever the lectionary elves were to include writings other than Biblical texts, other writings inspired by God in our Sunday morning readings, I’d expect Don Quixote to be among them. By the way, I have found an alternative to the Common Lectionary I’ll be preaching from. It’s entitled “Common Prayer: A Liturgy for Ordinary Radicals.”

Meanwhile, back to Don Quixote who said what’s on the front of your bulletin. “When life itself seems lunatic, who knows where madness lies? Perhaps to be too practical is madness. To surrender dreams — this may be madness. Too much sanity may be madness — and maddest of all: to see life as it is, and not as it should be!” 

These words about the spiritual nature of madness were written by Miguel Cervantes in the early 1600s. Cervantes knew his Bible. The Bible is filled with madness. Just consider how impractical the choices made by Abraham to leave his family and his country and go to where God told him to go; the impractical choice Moses had to make to leave the farm and go to challenge the dangerous Pharaoh to his face and all the risks that entailed; and how about Noah?

And what about the prophets who challenged corrupt kings and queens? Madness. And Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego whom what God taught them ran afoul of a cruel king trusted God enough to walk into the fiery furnace? Cervantes was speaking about them all when he said through the voice of Don Quixote, ““When life itself seems lunatic, who knows where madness lies?”

Don Quixote said that the decision to surrender dreams may be madness. What dreams did Micah and Jeremiah and the others surrender when God called them to say words that caused his family and community to think him mad? What about the dreams the disciples had for their lives when Jesus showed up and asked them to leave their boats and their families and follow him?

What if Cervantes was right when he said, “Too much sanity may be madness — and maddest of all: to see life as it is, and not as it should be, then the maddest of all was Jesus of Nazareth.

Imagine the madness of Jesus. Modern preachers have tamed him, attempting to mask the madness with an image of a man holding a child on his lap while petting a lamb, they’ve striven to remove the madness but there’s no escaping the fact that Jesus’s own mother and brothers thought him to be mad because anyone who stood against tradition, as he did, must be mad.

We see it in this morning’s Gospel reading from Mark. It seems innocent enough. Religious elite of the day take offense when Jesus and his disciples are seen eating without washing their hands. Small thing to us today…but a really big deal to those whose job it was to enforce tradition. Isn’t really about clean hands. Something deeper is at play.

Mark recalls the moment. The Pharisees asked Jesus, “Why do your disciples not live according to the tradition of the elders?” There it is. It’s about protecting tradition at all costs. Jesus is direct though directness is a symptom of madness. He said to them, “Isaiah was right about you hypocrites. And then Jesus quotes Isaiah.

This people honors me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me; in vain do they worship me, teaching human precepts as doctrines. ’You abandon the commandment of God and hold to human tradition.”

What got Don Quixote into trouble was reading all those books about knights and chivalry and taking them seriously. They told aspiring knights how they should live. Don Quixote made the mistake of actually living that way. For Jesus, it was the Hebrew Bible, the Old Testament.

Harold Bloom wrote the introduction to a translation of Cervantes’ classic, quoting W.H Auden referring to Don Quixote as a Christian saint, calling the fictional knight “gloriously idiosyncratic.” Oh, to be remembered as “gloriously idiosyncratic.” If any of you plan to speak at my funeral, please make a note of those word. Gloriously idiosyncratic. And I will try to live up to that calling between now and then.

Jesus lived, as do we, in times when religion often became a far cry from the hope God has for the world, exchanging God’s story of the madness of the prophets for a more timid belief in God, where religious rulemaking prevailed rather than practical theology and risky teachings, rather than the guide to seeing life as it is, and not as it should be and the willingness to say and do something about it.
Much of today’s religion is as it was the day Jesus challenged the religious elite of his day, when he understood that being holier-than-thou was not the benchmark but that being Christ-like was and that was seen by the holier-than-thou crowd as being madness.
According to Mark, Jesus told the religionists that they have abandoned the word of God in order to hold on to their tradition. So, what is Jesus saying to us 2000 years later? What matters in a life of faith? Which is more important: following prescribed rituals or following the words of the prophets? What parts of our daily living set us apart from people who see us as eccentric?
In Jesus’s time, it was what you wore, what you eat and for males, whether you were circumcised that set you apart. What sets us apart or do we even want to be set apart. It’s scary risky to appear to be different, to walk a path others say leads to madness.

Some people have looked at this question and have concluded that you can’t find God in a church. Most people, have for one reason or another often connected to feeling that those of us in the pews each Sunday morning are hypocrites who talk the talk but don’t walk the walk.

Last Sunday we had nearly 80 people in this sanctuary. Last Sunday, many came to hear the old music which they associated with the crazier times in their lives; times when people took risks to speak out; times characterized by Martin Luther King and Malcolm X, John Lewis and others who put is all on the line. There was something about the opportunity to hear and to sing the old songs of the days of protest that caused some who don’t believe in going to church to show up here last Sunday and to stay home today.

I fear they lump all of us Christians into the same staleness and believe we worry about clean hands more than clean hearts.

Today’s Gospel reading raises the question of ritualistic, traditional hand washing. This question is bigger than righteous rule-following; this is about expanding membership in the family of God. Jesus turns it around and says it isn't really about whose hands are dirty, it is about who we see as unclean.

Jesus is not suggesting that believers leave behind the rituals and the tradition. Indeed, he participates in much of it; teaching in the synagogue, preaching and praying and sharing bread and wine.

For Jesus, it is a question of whether those traditions and rituals are designed to leave someone behind. Do they draw lines of exclusion or inclusion and I can tell you that many of those who were here last Sunday and not today have been hurt by religionists who have used the Bible and the rituals to exclude and while they came to hear the old songs, they are unwilling to expose themselves to another hurt at the hands of those who claim the authority of God.  

If we want them to be a part of Highlands, we have to give them a reason to believe we are as mad as those with whom they marched and  sang “We shall overcome” and had a deeply spiritual feeling that through God and the teachings of Jesus, we would, actually overcome.

Highlands is a community that seeks to be faithful. The books you choose to study during our Monday book clubs would be banned in some churches. Your level of theological curiosity opens your minds to seek new learnings in a way that would not be accepted by many of the modern-day traditionalists. 

Next Saturday, when you gather here at Highlands to prepare a place for Sanctuary, you are doing much more than cleaning a room and moving furniture. By your faith-based actions, you are saying that we are keeping our eyes on the prize, that we know we will overcome, that the times they are a changing; you are proclaiming the Good News of Jesus Christ. Reach out to friends. Invite them to be a part of the ritual of preparing that room, friends you know to love God and others and might want to join us in demonstrating it in real and risky ways.

They are out there and I believe they are longing for a relationship with God and a faith community that is real and relational. The want to know what it’s like to be a part of a Quixotic community, to be thought of as mad and to share time with those who believe as did the errant knight that, “When life itself seems lunatic, who knows where madness lies? Perhaps to be too practical is madness. To surrender dreams — may be madness. Too much sanity may be madness — and maddest of all: to see life as it is, and not as it should be!”

Sharing Highlands is not to evangelize as some faith communities do, but to be a gift to those who have reason to fear church and need to know that we are here and we want them to join us in tilting at windmills those who are as comfortable as we in being known as “gloriously idiosyncratic.” AMEN